<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Poems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theformalist.org/archives/526/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/526</link>
	<description>ISSN 1532-558X</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/526/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theformalist.org/?p=526#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Mr. Thackrey, I really liked your six poems.  I felt some identity with the work and appreciated the effort you took to get some meter and rhyme into the verses.  Some of the newer poetry without such discipline is often cute, even humerous, and occasionally has an edifying message, but will it still be around in 100 years?  Is the answer that technology has doomed all poetry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thackrey, I really liked your six poems.  I felt some identity with the work and appreciated the effort you took to get some meter and rhyme into the verses.  Some of the newer poetry without such discipline is often cute, even humerous, and occasionally has an edifying message, but will it still be around in 100 years?  Is the answer that technology has doomed all poetry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

