<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New Formalist &#187; George Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theformalist.org/archives/author/george-good/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theformalist.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1532-558X</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 04:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Salemi vs. The State of Poetry</title>
		<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/41</link>
		<comments>http://theformalist.org/archives/41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Good</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newformalistpress.com/portal/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by George Good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<div><em>(Joseph Salemi argues the case against the present state of poetry before Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia)<br />
</em></div>
</blockquote>
<p>JS&mdash;I&#8217;m honored, sir, to stand before this court.<br />
I notice, though, we are a few robes short.</p>
<p>AS&mdash;The other justices have all recused<br />
Themselves.&nbsp; They think the system was abused<br />
When you were granted standing.&nbsp; I dissent.<br />
My colleagues claim to be incompetent<br />
To judge the merits of the case you&#8217;ve brought.<br />
But Antonin Scalia&#8217;s never bought<br />
The notion he&#8217;s incompetent to rule<br />
On anything.&nbsp; I hear that at your school<br />
It is the ancient classics you profess.<br />
I know some Latin, sir, as you may guess<br />
Since law&#8217;s my line and I&#8217;m a Catholic.<br />
What&#8217;s more, there is no clever lawyer&#8217;s trick<br />
I haven&#8217;t seen.&nbsp; So don&#8217;t presume to think<br />
You&#8217;ll sneak one by me&mdash;for I never blink.</p>
<p>JS&mdash;Deception, I assure you, has no place<br />
In what is I believe a solid case.</p>
<p>AS&mdash;As I tell everyone who comes to bat<br />
Before this court: I&#8217;ll be the judge of that.<br />
Be glad it&#8217;s not a case of life or death!</p>
<p>JS&mdash;Beginning with the first Elizabeth<br />
The course of English poetry stayed true<br />
To principles conservatives like you<br />
Insist must be the very bedrock on<br />
Which civilized society is run.<br />
Tradition should be hard as adamant&mdash;<br />
So also your &quot;original intent.&quot;<br />
When courts usurp the legislature&#8217;s role<br />
In trying to obtain a legal goal<br />
More than just propriety&#8217;s at stake&mdash;<br />
The moral order, too, begins to quake.<br />
A court which tries to make the law is like<br />
A certain kind of poet who would strike<br />
Out on his own and flout the settled will<br />
Of this legislature that&#8217;s in session still&mdash;<br />
Those wise men of true classical restraint<br />
Who understood the poet is no saint<br />
Or mystic, but a craftsman with an eye<br />
On entertaining, not to answer why.<br />
Romantic egos who supplanted Pope<br />
Started this art upon the slippery slope<br />
Of rank subjectivism, so that verse<br />
Declined into the personal&mdash;and worse.<br />
When gnostical religiosity<br />
Lured modern poets to attempt to free<br />
Their work from so-called artificial dross,<br />
The &quot;purity&quot; achieved came at the loss<br />
Of all the aids which help a poet sing:<br />
Sans beat, sans rhyme, sans tropes, sans everything.</p>
<p>AS&mdash;Your argument&#8217;s impressive but what could<br />
This high court do in order to make good<br />
The damages inflicted on your art?</p>
<p>JS&mdash;Your honor, I don&#8217;t give a flaming fart,<br />
To be quite blunt, for legal damages.<br />
I want these bores with their &quot;deep&quot; images<br />
To face the wrath of public ridicule.<br />
I want the New York or whatever school<br />
That might succeed it (who is next&mdash;Dubuque?<br />
Those self-indulgent coteries make me puke)<br />
To feel the lash of indignation&#8217;s whip.<br />
To workshops I would like to go and nip<br />
In the bud that nascent generation which<br />
Unleashed will soon be adding to the kitsch<br />
Whose odor makes our literature a joke.<br />
And all poetic gurus blowing smoke<br />
Should suffer fumigation from my pen<br />
Until we never hear of them again.</p>
<p>AS&mdash;You are a man, sir, after my own heart,<br />
Since I as well give not a flaming fart<br />
For restitution from the liberals.<br />
It&#8217;s much more fun to grab them by the balls<br />
And using logic make them understand.<br />
Approach the bench while I extend my hand&mdash;<br />
Don&#8217;t worry, the Salemi family jewels<br />
Are safe.&nbsp; Shake, pal.&nbsp; It&#8217;s us against the fools.<br />
This court&#8217;s dismissed.&nbsp; But you are welcome, Joe,<br />
To join me at that other bar.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s go.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theformalist.org/archives/41/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
