<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The New Formalist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theformalist.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theformalist.org</link>
	<description>ISSN 1532-558X</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five Poems by Home &#171; Damian Balassone: Poems</title>
		<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/1395/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Home &#171; Damian Balassone: Poems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theformalist.org/?p=1395#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] The Sleeper and 5 poems featured in New Formalist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Sleeper and 5 poems featured in New Formalist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Six Poems by andy</title>
		<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/526/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theformalist.org/?p=526#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Mr. Thackrey, I really liked your six poems.  I felt some identity with the work and appreciated the effort you took to get some meter and rhyme into the verses.  Some of the newer poetry without such discipline is often cute, even humerous, and occasionally has an edifying message, but will it still be around in 100 years?  Is the answer that technology has doomed all poetry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Thackrey, I really liked your six poems.  I felt some identity with the work and appreciated the effort you took to get some meter and rhyme into the verses.  Some of the newer poetry without such discipline is often cute, even humerous, and occasionally has an edifying message, but will it still be around in 100 years?  Is the answer that technology has doomed all poetry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Six Sonnets by Tom Riley</title>
		<link>http://theformalist.org/archives/309/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theformalist.org/?p=309#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Note the purity of Moore&#039;s rhymes.

He beats the great Romantics at this -- and at other things also.

TR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the purity of Moore&#8217;s rhymes.</p>
<p>He beats the great Romantics at this &#8212; and at other things also.</p>
<p>TR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

